🔗 Share this article

Trump’s most recent warning to introduce an extra complete levy on products from China has been described as a “typical example” of American hypocrisy, as stated by the China’s leadership.

A official from China’s Commerce Ministry additionally remarked that the nation could introduce its own unrevealed “responsive actions” if the American leader executes his warning, noting that the country was “not afraid” of a looming trade war.

Last Friday, Donald Trump hit back at the Chinese government’s action to tighten its rules for exports of critical elements, charging Beijing of “becoming very hostile” and attempting to hold the world “under its control”.

Additionally, he warned to pull out of a scheduled meeting with China’s President Xi, which was set for a meeting in the Republic of Korea in the coming weeks.

Trump’s comments on that day rattled stock exchanges, with the S&P 500 closing down over two and a half percent, marking its largest decline since last spring.

His comments reignited concerns of a commercial dispute between the United States and China.

This past spring, the respective governments had agreed to remove triple-digit tariffs on each other’s imports, which had led to concerns of commerce ceasing between the two nations.

Consequently, United States levies on Chinese goods incurring an additional import tax compared with the year’s onset, while American products entering China are subject to a ten percent duty.

China’s latest remarks – published by the Ministry of Commerce in the manner of formal replies to press queries – mirrored terminology from the zenith of the ongoing trade dispute.

The remarks condemned American limits on exports on chips and semi-conductors while justifying the country’s own overseas sale regulations on rare earth minerals as “routine measures” to ensure national security and that of every country.

The official said that for “a long time”, the America had “broadened the definition” of national security, abused overseas sale restrictions and “adopted discriminatory practices against China.

“Resorting to trade levy ultimatums is not the correct approach to deal with the Chinese government,” their representative said.

“China’s position on a tariff war has consistently been consistent: we wish to avoid one, but we are unafraid of one.”

Last week, Beijing announced it was tightening overseas sale regulations on key elements and other materials essential to high-technology production.

This was seen as a key move, as the country handles about 90% of the planet’s critical minerals, which are utilized in items such as solar panels and mobile phones.

New remarks from both governments are being interpreted by some as a strategy of enhancing bargaining power in preparation for forthcoming discussions.

Is not yet known whether a talks between the former president and China’s leader, scheduled at a summit in South Korea in the coming weeks, will take place as planned.