🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.