🔗 Share this article

I possess a few opinions about the comments delivered by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz in the New York major last eight. Look – Fritz is American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. Some letdown would have been understandable. Rather, he brought up the continued drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

We all love a narrative, myself included. But really. Even if Fritz had beaten the legend for the first time, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the following match, who he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, against whom Fritz had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the previous seven grand slams (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). Fritz said in post-match interviews after the loss that he in fact preferred his path, because it presented the chance to defeat the three best competitors in the world back-to-back. He is more than justified to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match who else in their right mind had the lack of American champions on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the global rankings entering the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six matches over No 3 the German with growing comfort. Presumably he might claim that position for himself in the future. But it’s clear that right now, that is as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of ranking points away. Fritz’s elite delivery and concussive strength on both forehand and reverse side are more than adequate to dispose of most opponents on the professional circuit. When facing the select few generational talents, however, Fritz is frequently overmatched. The last several years has witnessed the interesting rise of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless move around with the surprising quickness and fluidity of much shorter men. He is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the other player was dictating, and hitting a soft shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty severe restriction on his potential.

Fritz has made a number of significant, improbable advancements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly exploded up to No 4 – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the ongoing drought of US male players winning grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best run to the Wimbledon last four in July.

Fritz’s performance in that exact quarter-final should have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four sets, a win that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when the American had saved a few match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the rallies, with Fritz creating plenty of chances to break. But Djokovic rescued break point after break point, prolonging the run to the point of agony. When he finally did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately produced a terrible service game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the main contest and compelled him to use far too much effort to win it. Facing set points in the final game, his first serve floated to the sky. He extended the match twice on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It was not a collapse, I didn’t think, only a consequence of having to hit too many second serves.

The match was fairly compelling evidence that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of the Serbian, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and never particularly seem like he thought he could win. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has acquired enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is those who were expecting Fritz to prevail, and pressuring him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that suggested he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective voice in media sessions, exceeding virtually anyone on the men's tour except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only say how he feels or the tactic he believed decided a contest, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States not produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in June of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying empire is actually highly unlikely for all other players. {